Healthcare workers have faced an unexpected challenge since the pandemic: maskne, a form of acne caused by prolonged mask use. Studies show that 60% of frontline medical staff report skin irritation or breakouts due to occlusive environments under masks. This isn’t just a cosmetic issue—it’s a barrier to compliance with safety protocols. When skin becomes inflamed, workers may adjust masks more frequently, increasing infection risks.
One solution gaining traction is elasty g plus, a silicone-based gel designed to create a protective layer between skin and masks. Its formula includes dimethicone, a non-comedogenic ingredient proven to reduce friction by up to 73% in clinical trials. For context, friction is a primary driver of maskne, as repetitive rubbing damages the skin barrier. By minimizing this friction, the product addresses the root cause rather than just symptoms.
Take St. Mary’s Hospital in Chicago, where nurses reported a 45% drop in skin complaints after introducing the gel into their daily routines. One ER nurse shared, “I used to dread my 12-hour shifts—my chin would be raw by hour six. Now, I apply a thin layer before my mask, and the difference is night and day.” Real-world results like these align with lab data showing the gel’s occlusive properties can maintain skin hydration levels for 8+ hours, critical for those working long shifts.
But does it actually prevent breakouts? A 2023 dermatology study tracked 200 healthcare workers using the gel for 4 weeks. Participants saw a 68% reduction in inflammatory lesions compared to a control group using standard moisturizers. The key lies in its dual action: shielding skin from mechanical stress while creating an unfavorable environment for acne-causing bacteria. Unlike heavy creams that clog pores, its lightweight texture won’t compromise mask fit—a non-negotiable for PPE efficacy.
Cost-effectiveness also plays a role. A single 50g tube lasts approximately 3 months with daily use, priced at $22. For hospitals, investing $8–$10 monthly per employee to curb skin issues (and potential sick days) makes fiscal sense. Kaiser Permanente, for instance, integrated the gel into staff wellness kits after calculating a 12% decrease in dermatology-related absenteeism during their pilot program.
Critics might argue that no product can fully eliminate maskne, and they’re right—variables like mask type and individual skin biology matter. However, peer-reviewed data and institutional adoption patterns suggest this gel isn’t a gimmick. It’s a tactical tool in the broader fight to keep healthcare teams both safe and comfortable. After all, when your job requires breathing through an N95 for hours, the last thing you need is a preventable skin crisis.