1 thought on “Can the dog lose the police to accept it?”

  1. First, can the dog lose? Because dogs are part of the personal property of citizens, they can choose to call the police when they are stolen, because it is theft at this time; but if the dog is thrown by itself, the police generally will not accept the case. Therefore, the dog needs to be stolen when the alarm is alarm. According to relevant laws and regulations, the police are divided according to their responsibilities, which does not include help to find lost pets. However, if the dog loses is illegal and criminal, it belongs to the jurisdiction of the public security organs, and the parties may report the case to the public security organs in accordance with the law, and the public security organs shall be investigated and dealt with in accordance with the law.
    2. Legal basis: Article 264 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China
    [Theft] Theft of public and private property is large, or theft, theft of households, carried weapon theft If the picker is in prison, detention or control of less than three years, and punishment or a single fine; if there is a huge amount or other serious circumstances, it will be imprisoned for more than three years and ten years. For other particularly serious circumstances, in prison or life imprisonment of more than ten years, and fined or confiscated property.
    . What is the difference between the crime of theft and intentional destroying property
    1. The crime of theft refers to the act of stealing public and private property for the purpose of illegal possession. The crime of intentional destroying property refers to the behavior that deliberately destroys or damaged public and private property, with a large amount or other serious circumstances. From the definition, the difference between the crime of theft and the intentional destruction of property is that the purpose of illegal possession of the theft of theft is the purpose of the purpose, and the crime of intentional destroying the property is not; It is not whether it is subjective whether there is an illegal possession, but whether it objectively infringes the possession of others. The act of destroying the property possessed by others, constituting the crime of theft, and did not infringe on the destruction of the property possessing by others, and then it constituted the crime of deliberately destroying property.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart